Contract Law SQE1 practice questions
In SQE1, Contract Law sets formation, terms, vitiating factors, termination and remedies in short client scenarios. Candidates usually know it from a degree, and the marks lost go on familiar rules applied loosely, such as incorporation, the postal rule and remoteness.
Updated 25 September 2026 · Checked against SRA sources listed below
SQE1 at a glance
- questions in each FLK
- 170
- per question on average
- 1.8 min
- out of 500 to pass each FLK
- 300
- passed SQE1 in January 2026
- 53%
Contract law · 8 questions, adaptive order
1 of 8
Question 1 · Contract terms · FLK1
A woman bought a new sofa online from a furniture retailer for her home. Before she ordered it, the retailer's website stated that the sofa's frame was made of solid oak. Relying on that statement, she ordered the sofa.
It was delivered with a printed care label stating the frame was, in fact, a mix of oak veneer and manufactured board. She did not notice this until months later, when a leg cracked. The retailer says the website description was 'just marketing' and that the care label reflects the true materials.
Is the retailer's website description of the frame as solid oak a term of the contract?
Question 2 · Remedies for breach of contract · FLK1
A man contracted to buy a specific vintage car from a dealer for £45,000. In breach of contract, the dealer sold the car to someone else and could not deliver it. A car of the same specification was available elsewhere for £51,000, and the man bought that substitute car for £51,000. No money had been paid under the original contract before the dealer's breach.
What is the man's expectation loss?
Question 3 · Remedies for breach of contract · FLK1
A wholesaler supplied a retailer with a batch of goods that breached the sale contract, leaving the retailer short of stock for six weeks. During that period the retailer did not source replacement stock from another wholesaler, although similar stock was available from at least two other suppliers at broadly similar prices. The retailer said it deliberately chose not to switch suppliers because it did not want to damage a long-standing business relationship with the wholesaler. The retailer claimed £9,000 for lost profit during the six weeks. The wholesaler argued that this loss should not be recoverable because the retailer failed to mitigate it.
Who bears the burden of proving whether the retailer failed to mitigate its loss by not sourcing replacement stock?
Question 4 · Remedies for breach of contract · FLK1
A manufacturer contracted to supply a bakery with a new industrial oven, to be delivered and installed by 1 March. The manufacturer knew the bakery would use the oven in its ordinary business, but was not told anything about its expected profits. Delivery was two weeks late.
The bakery claims for its ordinary lost profits during the delay, calculated by reference to its usual monthly turnover. It also claims for the loss of an exceptionally lucrative one-off contract to supply a wedding, which would have generated profits far above its normal level, and about which the manufacturer had not been told.
For which of these heads of loss can the bakery recover damages from the manufacturer?
Question 5 · Contract terms · FLK1
A haulage company contracted with a manufacturer to store the manufacturer's goods at its warehouse. The written contract, agreed between the two businesses, excluded 'all liability for loss or damage however caused, including death or personal injury caused by negligence'.
While visiting the warehouse to inspect stock, an employee of the manufacturer was seriously injured because the haulage company's staff had negligently left a pallet unsecured.
Is the clause effective to exclude the haulage company's liability for the employee's injury?
Question 6 · Termination: performance, breach and frustration · FLK1
A company contracted to build a bespoke stage set for an outdoor festival for £60,000, half payable in advance. The organiser paid £30,000 in advance. Before construction began, new legislation banned outdoor gatherings of the kind planned, making the festival illegal to hold and frustrating the contract. By then the company had incurred £8,000 of design and material costs preparing for the build. The organiser applies to recover the £30,000 already paid.
If the court considers it just to do so, what is the maximum sum the company may retain out of the £30,000 paid?
Question 7 · Vitiating factors · FLK1
A dealer in classic motorcycles agreed by telephone at 11am on Monday to sell a specific 1960s motorcycle for £30,000 to a private limited company that restores and resells classic motorcycles ('the Buyer'). The motorcycle was kept in a warehouse run by a storage firm. The Buyer paid a deposit of £3,000 the same day and agreed to collect the motorcycle on Friday.
Unknown to either party, an electrical fire had destroyed the warehouse and everything in it at 3am that Monday. Neither party was at fault for the fire. The dealer had insured the motorcycle, and the Buyer had already agreed to resell it to a collector.
What is the effect of the fire on the contract between the dealer and the Buyer?
Question 8 · Parties: privity and third-party rights · FLK1
A man paid a driving school £900 for a course of 30 lessons for his daughter, aged 19. The written contract between the man and the school named the daughter as the pupil. Clause 12 of the contract stated:
"Nothing in this contract confers any right on any person who is not a party to it under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999."
After five lessons, the school closed its local branch and told the daughter that there would be no more lessons. She had already booked her driving test in reliance on the course and has had to cancel it.
Who, if anyone, can sue the driving school for breaking its promise to give the lessons?
SQE1 at a glance
- questions in each FLK
- 170
- per question on average
- 1.8 min
- out of 500 to pass each FLK
- 300
- passed SQE1 in January 2026
- 53%
What Contract Law covers in SQE1
The SRA's assessment specification for assessments from 1 September 2026 lists six groups of topics:
- Formation: offer and acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations, certainty and capacity.
- Parties: privity of contract and the rights of third parties.
- Terms: express terms, incorporation, terms implied by common law and statute, exemption clauses, interpretation, classification as conditions, warranties and innominate terms, and variation.
- Vitiating factors: misrepresentation, mistake, unfair contract terms, duress and undue influence, and illegality.
- Termination: expiry or another specified event, breach, frustration, and the basic principles of restitution and unjust enrichment on termination.
- Remedies: damages, liquidated sums and penalties, specific performance, injunctions, the duty to mitigate, indemnities and guarantees, with causation and remoteness.
Classification of terms is listed as its own item for the first time in the 2026 specification.
Where it sits in FLK1
Contract is examined in FLK1, in session 2 from January 2027, with Tort and the Legal System of England and Wales with Constitutional and Administrative Law and EU Law. Each session has 85 questions, grouped by subject and randomised within the session. In the SRA's 2019 blueprint Contract makes up 14 to 20 percent of FLK1.
Contract rules also reach beyond session 2. A claim in Dispute Resolution, a pre-incorporation contract in Business Law and Practice, or a sale in Property Practice may turn on them. Ethics can arise in any Contract question. The law examined in January 2027 is the law in force on 11 September 2026.
Where candidates go wrong
In the SRA's annual report for 2023/24, Contract had a mean scaled score of 335, the highest in FLK1 apart from ethics. The marks lost tend to go on rules candidates think they know, and these traps recur in our question bank.
- Timing of incorporation. A term on a ticket, a receipt or a notice seen only after the contract was made is not part of it, however clearly it is worded. A signed document binds whether or not it was read.
- The postal rule stretched too far. Acceptance by post takes effect on posting only where post is a reasonable means and the offer does not require the acceptance to reach the offeror. A revocation of the offer takes effect only when it is received.
- Exclusion clauses read as drafting problems. Some liabilities cannot be excluded at all, such as liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence. For the rest, the clause must cover the loss on its true construction and then pass the statutory test that applies.
- Remoteness and mitigation confused. Remoteness asks what was within the reasonable contemplation of both parties when the contract was made, under the two limbs of Hadley v Baxendale. Knowledge gained after that date does not count. Mitigation is a separate question about what the claimant reasonably did after the breach.
- Penalties judged by the old test. A clause triggered by breach is tested by whether it protects a legitimate interest and is not out of all proportion to it. Asking only whether it was a genuine pre-estimate of loss leads to the wrong option.
Frustration adds a numerical trap. Under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943, money paid before the frustrating event is recoverable and money payable ceases to be payable, but the court may let the payee keep up to its expenses. An answer that returns everything, or nothing, has usually missed the expenses allowance.
How to revise Contract Law
Revise in the order a problem is solved: formation, terms, exclusion or invalidity, breach or discharge, then remedy. Working through the stages in order shows which one a question is testing.
Learn the statutory routes side by side: the Consumer Rights Act 2015 for traders dealing with consumers, and the Sale of Goods Act 1979, the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 between businesses. Learn the remedies with numbers and practise the calculation of expectation loss, reliance loss and the 1943 Act adjustment.
Contract and Tort share session 2 and share several concepts, remoteness among them, with different tests. Revising them in the same weeks makes the differences easier to hold. The SQE1 study plan places both in the weeks before your sitting.
Questions candidates ask
Only where the case name is the usual term for the principle. The specification says candidates are not otherwise required to recall case names, so a Contract question describes the facts and asks for the outcome, and the rule matters more than the case that set it.
Yes, within terms implied by statute and unfair contract terms. Many questions turn on whether the buyer is a consumer, which decides whether the Consumer Rights Act 2015 applies or the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.
The specification for assessments from 1 September 2026 adds the classification of contract terms as conditions, warranties and innominate terms as an item of its own. It applies to the January 2027 sitting onwards.
Contract is a session 2 subject from January 2027, but the specification allows a question to draw on more than one subject area. A Dispute Resolution or Business Law question in session 1 can depend on a contract rule, while being classified to its own subject.
Sources
- SRA: SQE1 Assessment Specification (assessments from 1 September 2026)Checked 23 September 2026
- SRA: SQE changes (September 2026)Checked 23 September 2026
- SRA: SQE1 Functioning Legal Knowledge assessment specification (August 2019), Annex 4 blueprintChecked 23 September 2026
- SRA: SQE Annual Report 2023/24Checked 23 September 2026
SQE1 Ready is independent of the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Rules, dates and fees can change: the SRA is the authority, and this page is checked against it.
Check Contract against the subjects you know less well
Contract is often a candidate's strongest subject, and it shares FLK1 session 2 with Tort and the Legal System. The free diagnostic asks 13 questions across FLK1 and FLK2 in about 15 minutes and gives a first read on every subject, including the practice subjects most degrees leave out.
13 questions · about 15 minutes · free, no card details